Why Miniatures and Paintings Need Different Finish
A perspective proof with eye a, object b c, and two glass planes d e and f g
This chapter argues that the nearest figures of a picture, being small, must be as highly finished as a miniaturist's work, while a painter's larger figures may be less finished because they are meant to be seen from afar; a small work seen close and a large one seen far reach the eye at the same visual angle. Leonardo proves the point with a small diagram in which the eye a views the object b c through two glass planes, d e and f g, showing that the painted image must grow smaller and less finished as the plane recedes from the eye. He warns that giving a diminished figure the full finish of a near one would falsify its perspective, because the degree of finish would no longer agree with the distance.
On this page
Finish must suit the viewing distance
The nearest figures, being small, must be rendered as finished as a miniaturist's work, while the painter's larger figures are meant to be viewed from afar. A small work seen close and a large one seen far strike the eye at an equal angle, so they read as the same size.
Proof with eye a, object b c and glass planes d e, f g
With the eye a held fixed and the object b c seen through the glass planes d e and f g, the painted image must shrink as the plane nears the eye and be finished to a matching degree. If figure p o were as finished as the natural b c its perspective would be false, for its finish would not agree with its distance.
