Double and Triple Reflections, and Contrast of Field
Why reflections read best against dark grounds, with a diagram of simple and double reflection
The page finishes a rule that a small color near at hand tinges a reflection more than a large color far off, citing the sixth proposition of perspective, that large things at a distance may look far smaller than small things close by. A chapter on where reflections are most perceptible explains that a reflection stands out against a darker field and fades against a lighter one, by the principle that contrasting darks and whites make each other appear more extreme. A final chapter, illustrated with a small lettered diagram, distinguishes simple reflection (seen from a single lit body, d h e) from double reflection (seen from two lit bodies, n p m), holding that double reflections have greater power and cast only faint shadows.
On this page
A near small color outweighs a far large one
A small color near at hand tinges a reflection more than a large color far off, by the sixth proposition of perspective, which holds that large things may lie at so great a distance that they appear far smaller than small things close by.
Reflections read best against dark grounds
A reflection is of readier evidence against a field of greater darkness and less perceptible against a lighter one, because of things placed in contrast the less dark makes the darker seem murkier, and the whiter makes the other seem less white than it is.
Simple and double reflections
With the luminous body a and the direct light b c, the reflection d h e is simple, seen from a single lit body b a, while n p m is double, composed from the two lit bodies b r and d r e. Double reflections are of greater power than simple ones, and the shadow between the incident light n and the reflected light n p is of little darkness.
