The Paragone: King Matthias Chooses the Painting
The king turns from the poem to the portrait; sight is the worthier sense
The transcribed prose closes the argument that words satisfy only the hearing while painting satisfies sight, words being accidental and made by a lesser author than the nature the painter imitates. Section [27] then tells how, on his birthday, King Matthias set aside a poet's laudatory book and gazed with admiration at a painter's portrait of his beloved, defending his choice by declaring that sight is a worthier sense than hearing and that the science of painter to poet stands in the same proportion as their senses. The page ends by beginning the claim that the soul itself is composed of harmony. No drawing appears; the leaf carries only Melzi's fair-copy text.
On this page
Words serve hearing, painting serves sight
The opening lines rank the arts by the senses they serve: words satisfy the hearing, painting the contentment of sight. Words are called accidental and made by a lesser author than the works of nature, which the painter imitates and which are bounded within the figures of their surfaces.
Reply of King Matthias to the poet [27]
In section [27] King Matthias, presented on his birthday with both a poem and a portrait of his beloved, closes the poet's book and fixes his gaze on the painting. Rebuked for admiring a mute thing, he answers that painting serves a better sense than poetry, which is fit only for the blind, and that he would rather see and touch than merely hear.
