The angle of contingency and proportional triangles
Nested circles, tangent and secant lines, an iron-wire method, and a reflected-line problem
A geometrical leaf crowded with faint constructions of circles, tangent and secant lines and triangles investigating the 'angle of contingency' — the angle between a circle and its tangent. Leonardo imagines infinite circles nested one within another ending in a point, drawing a curve through their intersections, and gives a compass construction (lines p S and o m tangent to a given circle, perpendiculars n b and n r) to locate the angle of contingency where a curve cuts the given circle. When the construction point n falls too far off, he proposes bending a thin iron wire through the two intersections and the centre. A further passage proves triangles a i g and b g f proportional on the line i f, and a short optical problem asks for the incident line given the eye and the reflected line, concluding it is indeterminate.
On this page
Locating the angle of contingency by nested circles
Imagining infinite circles one within another, the last ending in a point, Leonardo draws a curve through their intersections. In the given circle he draws small inner circles, tangents p S and o m, then lines a b and b c from the intersections and perpendiculars n b and n r, striking from n a circle through the two intersections; where that curve cuts the given circle is the angle of contingency.
An iron-wire method when the centre falls too far off
The point n might sometimes be at a very great distance, so that such an angle could not be made. Then take a thin, straight iron wire and bend it so it touches the two intersections and the centre of the circle; where the wire touches the periphery of the given circle is the angle of contingency.
Proportional triangles a i g and b g f on line i f
The triangles a i g and b g f are proportional in all three sides through being placed on the straight line i f. Since b is placed twice as far from the angle of contingency g as a, it follows that b d is double a c, b f double a i, and f d double i c; the pyramid b e d cut at a c divides all lines from base b d to apex e in the same proportion.
Given eye and reflected line, the incident line is indeterminate
Given the eye and the whole length of the reflected line, the length of the incident line is asked. It cannot be given according to the poser's intention, because it may be of infinite shortness or length.
