Painting against poetry: the eye and the beauty of the world
Why natural beauty belongs to sight, and how the painter restores it
Part of the paragone, Leonardo's contest of the arts, this page argues that painting is the true imitator of the natural forms of all things and that a beauty enjoyed through the eye cannot be delivered through the ear by the poet. He asks what draws a man from the city to mountains and valleys if not the natural beauty of the world, which is grasped by sight alone. He then answers that the painter can set the same landscapes before you in the cold of winter, letting you see again the shady valleys, winding rivers and flowering meadows. The passage is written in a neat humanist hand and breaks off mid-sentence at the foot of the leaf.
On this page
Painting is the true imitator of nature, not poetry
Leonardo holds that the contemplation of a painted beauty cannot be conveyed as a described beauty in the same span of time, and that it sins against nature to put through the ear what belongs to the eye. Music may take the ear, but painting, the true imitator of the natural figures of all things, belongs to sight. This states the core of his comparison of painting with poetry.
The painter restores the beauty of the world in winter
The natural beauty of the world draws men from the city to mountains and valleys, and it is enjoyed by the sense of sight alone. In the cold of winter the painter can set the same landscapes before you, so that you see again the shady valleys watered by winding rivers, the varied flowers that make harmony to the eye, and the flowering meadows under verdant shade. Sight, the window of the soul, receives these images that the poet cannot supply.
