Which prop best supports a loaded beam
Lever and counter-lever calculations, and two lines meeting at a point
On the recto (99r) Leonardo poses a statics problem: to carry the weight n at the end a of a beam a b too weak to resist it, he asks whether the prop a p or the prop a q gives greater strength. A longer passage works out how the labour of a mover changes as the weight s is pulled along the lines n a, a m and f a, comparing the lever and counter-lever a e and their fractional shortenings. A third note, running down the right margin beside a column of figures, treats the intersection of two straight lines among four right angles, made truly at a point a but in greater contact at r. The facing leaf (102v) is largely blank in this opening.
On this page
Prop a p or prop a q to carry weight n on beam a b
Leonardo wishes to hold the weight n at the extreme point a; knowing that the beam a b lacks the strength to resist such a weight, he proposes to set beneath it either the prop a p or the prop a q, and asks which will be of greater power.
Labour of the mover pulling weight s along n a, a m and f a
Pulling the weight s along the line n a costs as much power as the weight's resistance, since the lever a e equals its counter-lever a e. Pulling along a m the mover gains 1/12 of labour because the lever b e falls short by 1/12; along f a the labour grows by a quarter, the lever line losing 1/4 and the lever d e losing 2/3. Along e a no force could lift it, the lever being divisible to infinity so that at each half the weight is doubled.
Two lines crossing at four right angles meet at points a and r
The intersection of two straight lines made among four right angles is made at a point; it occupies a space larger than a point in proportion as, of the four enclosing angles, the two opposite ones differ more from the other two. The intersection a is made at a point, while r is made in greater contact than that point.
