Earth's Gravity and the Quadrature of Divided Circles
Notes on the earth's descent to the centre, mathematical versus mechanical points, and the squaring of divided circles.
A densely written sheet, worked from several directions, that mixes natural philosophy with geometry. In text Leonardo argues that the earth moves straight toward the centre of the elements by the weight generated in it, defines gravity, and distinguishes the mathematical point (indivisible, without quantity) from the natural and mechanical point (visible, divisible to infinity), and the geometric centre from the centre of the balance and the centre of the world. Four circle diagrams at the foot support an exercise in squaring circles by removing and redistributing equal portions and crescents to leave equivalent squares and triangles. The Ambrosiana catalogue also tags this leaf with mechanical and architectural material, though the text transcribed here is philosophical and geometric.
On this page
The earth's straight descent to the centre of the elements
Leonardo states that the earth moves toward the centre of the elements by reason of the weight generated in it from every side, and that this motion is straight, along the diametral line, never revolving. He reasons about where the centre of acquired gravity lies and calls for a prior definition of gravity, since no gravity has permanence except where it dies.
Mathematical, natural and mechanical points contrasted
The mathematical point has no middle, is the smallest thing in nature and is indivisible, while the natural point is the mark left by an iron tip and is divisible to infinity. Between the mathematical and the mechanical there is infinite variety, since the mechanical point is visible, has continuous quantity and is divisible, whereas the mathematical has no quantity and so no division.
Squaring circles by redistributing portions and crescents
Working the four labelled circle figures, Leonardo removes the four greatest portions of a right and left circle and redistributes portions so that one circle becomes a square and the other an equal figure. He describes filling circles with 4 or 8 portions and gathering four portions into a single portion f to leave a large triangle, preserving the total value throughout.
