Lombard water-mills and the fall of water on the wheel
Field notes on Lombard mills: fall height, wheel vanes, and the narrowing mouth of the water-chute
Folio 151v records Leonardo's observations of Lombard water-mills with about three braccia of fall, drawn as sloping chutes striking paddle-wheels. He notes that the first mill in a line, a, runs strongest and the last, d, slowest on the same water, and argues the chute should meet the wheel far from its axle for full effect. Studying figure m, he criticises the very wide mouths that narrow toward the paddles, which throw the water near the axle where it does little work, and advises keeping the chute a uniform braccio and a half so the water strikes the wheel away from its pole.
On this page
Lombard mills: why the first in line runs strongest
Among the Lombards is a kind of mill with about 3 braccia of fall, set beneath one line of embankment at varying distances as necessity dictates. On the same water, the first mill a runs stronger than any and the last, d, is slowest. Reason requires that if the channel's obliquity at a were in the middle of the embankment, where the water pushes most, it would drive stronger than the others.
Set the water's exit so it does not drag the wheel
If the water falls a height of 3 braccia and then strikes the vanes of the wheel, arrange that the exit of the water after the impact does not submerge the part of the wheel which, beyond its axle, must rise out of the water.
Why a narrowing chute wastefully strikes near the axle
The Lombards make their mill-chute mouths very wide, narrowing until they strike the paddles: a braccio and a half at the mouth becomes less than half a braccio at the foot, so the water beats near the wheel's axle and does little work. Better to keep the chute a uniform braccio and a half with wide paddles, so the water's height stays equal and strikes the wheel far from its axle.
