The Weight of the Balance Beam and Its Two Gravities
Why a tilted beam swings, and how its two centres of gravity merge in free fall
Leonardo analyses the weight carried by the beam of a balance itself. A right-hand diagram shows the beam swinging about pole o, where the arm-weights n o r S outweigh n o t v and drive the oscillation ("ventilation") back and forth. In the main column he divides the beam's weight into a part that tends toward the centre of the world and an accidental part due to transverse motion, distinguishing the natural mathematical centre of gravity from the mathematical point of contact at the pivot. Citing his sixth proposition, he holds that any uniform body set obliquely has two divided gravities, but in free descent these two centres merge into one and the body then falls straight.
On this page
Unequal arm-weights cause the balance to swing (ventilation)
The oblique weight pushes from r to S and from t to v about pole o. The arms weigh n o t v and n o r S, and line n o divides these powers; n o r S wins because it is greater, and this inequality causes the balance's oscillation, in which the inequalities pass from one arm to the other for as long as the swinging lasts.
Two divided gravities: natural centre versus point of contact
The beam's weight splits into one part tending to the centre of the world and an accidental part from transverse motion. The natural mathematical centre is set by the equal opposed lateral weights and their distances, while the second centre is better called the mathematical point where the pole touches its support.
In free fall the two centres merge and the body drops straight
Citing the sixth proposition, every uniform parallel body placed obliquely has two divided gravities, one natural and simple, the other accidental and compound. Yet given free descent through air, the two centres transform into one another until a single common centre remains, and the body penetrates the air below with straight motion.
