What Impetus Is: Derivative Motion and the Moving Body
Impetus born of the mover, its decay by degrees, rotation, and the role of surrounding air
This closely written text page defines impetus as 'derivative motion', born from the primitive motion a body has while joined to its mover, and argues that no part of derivative motion ever equals the velocity of primitive motion. Using the bowstring and arrow as example, Leonardo says power is lost by degrees just as it was gained by degrees, and that the impetus impressed by the mover is infused equally into every part of the moving body, except in rotational motion where the outer, swifter parts turn about the slower ones near the centre. He then refutes the objection that the surrounding air drives the body forward: the air behind is merely drawn in to fill the void the body leaves, while the air compressed in front flees backward. A margin note continues the argument, adding that two colliding airs produce reflex whirling motions and that a mover's motion can never be increased by the moving body's motion.
On this page
Impetus as derivative motion born of the mover
Impetus is derivative motion, arising from the primitive motion a body has while joined to its mover; no part of it ever equals the primitive velocity. Like the arrow leaving the bowstring, its power is destroyed by degrees just as it was generated by degrees, and the impetus is infused equally into every part of the body.
Denying that surrounding air propels the body
Against the claim that the air behind pushes the mobile forward, Leonardo answers that the following air is only drawn in to fill the void the body leaves, while the air compressed ahead flees backward. Where the two airs collide, reflex whirling motions are born, and the mover always stays more powerful than the moved.
