The bounce: percussion versus impetus in falling bodies
How the height and angle of a rebound measure the two powers that cause it
This sheet develops Leonardo's science of the rebound (balzo), asking what proportion the power of percussion bears to the power of impetus in moving heavy bodies. He argues that the height a bounce gains comes from percussion and its length from impetus, and works a case in which the height d e enters the length b e c exactly four times. On the facing folio he adds that a percussion made upon a smaller angle has less power, so that percussions stand in the same ratio as their angles. A bounce arc, a graduated fan of angles, and a row of circles with impact lines accompany the argument.
On this page
Height from percussion, length from impetus
Leonardo asserts that what a rebounding body gains in height springs only from the simple percussion, and what it gains in length only from the impetus. In the bounce shown, the height d e enters the length b e c four times, so the power causing the bounce b d c enters the impetus a b four times. The higher a bounce stands relative to its length, the more percussion exceeds impetus.
Impetus and percussion counted in degrees
To make the relation numerical he divides the degrees of impetus into 16 and those of percussion into 4, treating impetus as four times more powerful. Then 4 degrees of impetus equal 4 degrees of percussion, and one degree of each yields an arc of rebound as high as it is long.
Percussion proportional to the angle of impact
On the facing folio he states that the percussion made upon a smaller angle has less power. Driving a body down the steeper angle to b returns it toward its start (the greatest blow), while sending it along d e strikes object e with power reduced in the ratio of angle e to angle b. Percussions thus stand in the same proportion as their angles.
