Water Raised by Counterweights and the Fall of Water
Whether a descending column of water can lift an equal weight of water
In this densely written sheet Leonardo argues that water forced upward by counterweights rises more readily through pipes, which keep it united, than through open air, where it scatters into a mist; and that rising water gains thickness and slowness at every degree of motion. He classifies the counterweights that press the water-reservoirs into nine regular natures (wider, narrower or equal to the reservoir, combined with heavier, lighter or equal to water). Turning to falling water and balls dropped from fifty braccia at musical intervals, he holds that a descending body gains a degree of velocity and weight in each degree of motion, forming a continuous arithmetic proportion. He concludes it is impossible to build any device in which descending water raises an equal weight and height of water.
On this page
Nine natures of counterweights that press the water-reservoirs
Water forced upward stays united through pipes but sparges into mist in open air if driven with excess force. The counterweights pressing the reservoirs are of three natures (heavier, lighter or equal to water) and three forms (wider, narrower or equal to the reservoir), giving nine regular kinds. Even a material lighter than water, made tall enough, can act as a counterweight heavier than water, as an upright beam does.
A freely falling body gains velocity and weight in every degree of motion
Gravity that descends freely acquires degrees of velocity and of weight at every degree of motion. Where water descends little it shows a pyramidal form, and though thinning lessens its weight, the blow it delivers is heavier than if that thin figure had reached the point of percussion. No effect in nature is without a reason: understand the reason and you need no experiment.
Continuous arithmetic proportion of the descending balls
Dividing each ball's descent into equal degrees of height, it gains one degree of velocity per degree of motion, so the velocities form a continuous arithmetic proportion whose differences are proportional. From the descent of the discrete quantity of the balls Leonardo concludes the descent of the continuous quantity of the water. He wrestles with the paradox that thinning water weighs less yet must not slow, else a vessel could not fill in due time.
Descending water cannot raise its equal in weight and height
It is impossible that water moving any instrument could ever lift, from the place where it settles, water of like weight to the height whence it departed. In a certain part of its descent the water thins and quickens so that the air divides its continuous quantity into a discrete one, imperceptible to the eye.
