Why the weight-wheel is 'sophistical' and will not turn
Percussion lost in the wheel; measuring right- and left-hand weight powers
Continuing the study of the overbalanced wheel, Leonardo shows how the percussion of the weight r upon h moves h but is lost in the wheel as a whole. He argues that although a weight falling from c to h might turn the wheel a sixth of its circle, the little supporting piece g then bears the returning load, so that the next percussion of f cannot repeat the turn — and he concludes that 'such a wheel is sophistical', a demonstrated fallacy. A closing note gives a simpler method for comparing the powers of the right- and left-hand weights by laying their distances from the wheel's central line end to end and measuring the excess. A large wheel with weighted arms is drawn above the text.
On this page
A wheel with weighted arms drawn above the text
The upper figure is a large wheel carrying weights on radiating arms (c, h, p, K, f, g among the labels), the same overbalanced device studied on the facing page. It is drawn to test whether the percussion of a falling weight can keep the wheel turning.
Percussion of r on h is lost in the wheel
Here it is shown how the percussion made by r upon h moves h, yet such percussion fails and is lost in the wheel as a whole.
Why the wheel is 'sophistical' and stops
When the weight goes from c to h it delivers its percussion, which might turn the wheel a sixth so that weight p hangs perpendicular like K did. But test whether the blow really turns that sixth; even if it did, the little attendant g bears the great returning load, so that the next percussion of f cannot repeat the turn. Hence such a wheel is sophistical, as demonstrated.
Comparing right and left weight-powers by their distances
To measure more simply the powers of the right-hand weights against the left, measure every space from the wheel's central line to each right-hand weight and set them one after another along one line; do the same for the left-hand weights along the same line. The excess of one line over the other is exactly the excess of the right-hand power over the left.
