Relative motion of an arrow at sea, and measuring a ship's speed
The arrow shot from a moving ship, and the flawed logs of Vitruvius and Alberti
Two linked discussions on motion. In 'On the motion of the moving body', Leonardo analyses relative motion: an arrow shot forward from the prow of a moving ship stays over the same spot when ship and arrow have equal speed, while an arrow shot astern separates from the ship by twice its own motion. He then turns to measuring a ship's speed per hour, criticising the paddle-wheel log that Vitruvius describes as valid only on still lake water, and the wind-struck board of Battista Alberti as workable only for an identical ship, load, sail and wave size. He closes by claiming his own method serves every vessel of oar or sail, large or small.
On this page
An arrow shot from a moving ship
The arrow shot from the prow against the ship's direction does not leave the spot it is loosed from, when ship and arrow move at equal speed. But an arrow shot toward the place the ship is fleeing separates from it by twice the arrow's own motion.
Vitruvius's paddle-wheel log and its flaw
The ancients used various devices to measure a ship's hourly run; Vitruvius describes a mill-wheel turned by the waves at its rim, whose whole revolutions trace out its circumference as a straight line. Leonardo judges it valid only on the flat, immobile water of lakes: if the water moves with the ship the wheel stays still.
Alberti's wind-board and Leonardo's universal method
Battista Alberti's method uses a light board struck by the wind, set more or less oblique as the wind is swifter or slower, calibrated over a known distance between islands. Leonardo objects that it works only for an identical ship, load, sail and wave size, whereas his own method serves every ship of oar or sail, small or large, narrow or long, high or low.
